About five years ago, my brother asked if he could read something I'd written for a creative writing course I was taking at a local fine arts college at the time, so I emailed him a story about a trip I'd taken with three girlfriends over fourth of July weekend during which my friend Kelly's Ford Escort began to sputter and cough smoke en route to St. Louis and we'd ended up stranded for the night in a town just off the highway called Boonville. I received an email from him the next day that quoted from the story:
"Trapped in Boonville. I imagined hanging out the local tavern and falling in love with a young, scruffy-faced man who wore Stetson cologne and flannel shirts. A manly type of man would would open doors for me and hold my hand as I stretched my leg to step into his large pick-up truck, the kind with four wheels on the back that are impossible to pass on the highway. We would get married and live on the outskirts of Boonville and our children would ride the bus to school. While he worked at the Plant during the day, I would pick fresh strawberries from the garden and make jars of jam to give to the neighbors and sell at a stand every October at the Boonville town festival." [emphasis his].
He went on to say, "I loved this. I laughed, thinking . . . this is my sister . . . this is how she thinks."
It has always been much easier for me to share the fruits of my right brain's labor with strangers than with friends or family. Somehow a room full of strangers at a writing studio or a billion sets of eyes plugged into the World Wide Web (or the twelve sets that may actually visit this blog) seem a safer, more comfortable audience. There's a decent-sized room in one corner of my brain where a tidbit of news on the war in Iraq, a rant against feminism I'd read in the online version of a UK newspaper, the way my nostrils appeared in a picture I'd looked at that morning and a thousand other microcosmic pieces of information that are not integral to my life or the workings of my daily routine are being constantly diced, ground and mixed in a rusty, sometimes loud machine that takes up most of the room. Occasionally, eventually, the machine spits something almost coherent into a more conscious lobe of my brain and I'm able to get it down on paper, or onto this blog. And then the machine continues to grind.
To invite a group of unaquainted passers-by - members of a writing class, or you, dear reader - for a tour of this room requires little to no preparation. No need to polish up the machine or parse through the thoughts being worked over and tuck away certain topics or ideas to avoid offense, embarrassment or the exposition of something too private or dripping with the stench of strong opinion. Strangers don't care about your mess, beyond its intrigue.
But a close friend on a tour of this room might spot that comment she made last week about your recent break-up being "For The Best" just as it slides through a chute and lands on the conveyor belt next to your Need To Mourn The Loss of This Relationship The Way The Middle Eastern Women You've Seen on TV Mourn Their Dead, with tears and howling and stumbling in dusty streets. And then that friend might feel ashamed for having said the wrong thing or betrayed that you have secretly mashed her well-intended words through your machine or she might feel that you are absurd for thinking about the pain of a break-up on the same plane as the pain of a death and she will think that you are too dramatic or serious.
The prospect of exposing the hulking, chugging machine to some of the people who've known me the longest has somehow grown in my imagination to the equivalent of revealing that all these years I've actually been spying on my friends and family for the CIA. As if they'll puzzle, "This is what she's been up to all along? I really don't know her at all." It's ridiculous, I know. And, in most cases, I imagine an example of how I underestimate people.
But the point of this post is that on the train home from work this evening, I read a chapter of Natalie Goldberg's Writing Down the Bones in which she writes about having accumulated a copious amount of old notebooks filled with her "complaints, boring descriptions, and flagrant anger" and how when she was considering throwing them out, a friend said she should hold on to them. Instead Goldberg left them on her friend's doorstep and, upon returning from a weekend trip, her friend told her, "I've been reading your notebooks all weekend. They are so intimate; so scared, insecure for pages, then suddenly they are not you - just raw energy and wild mind. And now here you are - Natalie - in the flesh, just a person. It feels so funny." Of the experience, Goldberg writes, "I feel good because I don't care that she sees how I really am. I'm glad. I want someone to know me."
The paragraph made me think about that time my brother read my story and instead of saying "I liked it" or "this part was funny" he said "this is my sister . . . this is how she thinks." And I realized how much I had wanted him, or anyone, to read something I'd written and understand something new about me, to know me, even if only from a silly passage about making strawberry jam. And I also thought of how, when I started this blog, I sent the link to my sister, my friend Sarah and J with a note, "In an effort to get myself writing and keep myself writing, I've started a blog. I figure the point of a blog is for someone else to read it, so you guys are the chosen. If and when you have time of course. Eventually I may share it with others. For now, I'm timid."
About two months later J and I went to dinner with Sarah and her boyfriend. Sarah brought up specific posts that she'd enjoyed, asked me if I'd thought about trying to polish any of them up for submission. J took rapid gulps from his water glass and offered an ambiguous affirmation of my explanation to Sarah as to why I blogged under a psuedonym, "It'd be bad if anyone from her work stumbled across it." After dinner I asked him if he'd ever logged onto my blog. He hadn't. Not once. In that moment, something told me it was over between us. Our relationship had always been tumultuous. He was hurt by my reflexive insensitivity. I was discouraged by his knee-jerk judgments of other people. So many things seemed like obstacles, but I'd always believed we could hurdle them. But I realized then that, two months before, I'd sent him an invitaton to tour the room in my brain that I only entrust to a select few and he'd tossed it like the Weekly Shopper.
"I felt like it would be an invasion of your privacy to read it," he said.
"But I invited you."
"I talk to you everyday. You should just be able to tell me what's on your mind. I shouldn't have to go to your blog and read it," he said.
"It's not the same. It's about the writing. You're missing the point."
"I'm sorry if I just don't have time!"
"You're lying." You didn't care. I don't know why, but you didn't. I don't understand why it feels like this is so important, but it does.
On the train today, reading another writer's - a real writer's, a published writer's - words, "I want someone to know me," I finally understand.
Recent Comments